THE AQUASAVE PROJECT
WATER SAVING SYSTEM IN
HOUSEHOLDS
 |
 |
| LIFE
97 ENV/IT/000106
|
Life Environment Programme
|
|
 |
|
THE AQUASAVE PROJECT:
WATER SAVING SYSTEM IN HOUSEHOLDS
ENEA
(Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment);
ARPA (Environment Regional Agency of Emilia Romagna); Az.USL (Bologna City
Health District); G. DOZZA Cooperative society; Scagliarini (Architect);
SeaBo S.p.A. (Energy and Environment Company of Bologna); Bologna
Municipality.
|
|
ABSTRACT
Water is precious for life and its
needs. Water must be protected and used in an appropriate way. Drinkable
water use in household is not always appropriate; only
a small percentage is used for drinking or food preparation (~ 4%)
the remaining part is consumed for other uses.
The aquasave project aims to study and evaluate the potentiality
of drinkable water saving in households (see figure 1), by means of
an experimental new model of water resources management implemented in the
city of Bologna in Italy.
Results show a valid possibility
for drinking water saving in households.
KEY WORDS
Potable water saving, greywater
reuse, rainwater use, components at low water consumption.
INTRODUCTION
Water demand in the world is always
high. Water resources are not unlimited. In geographic areas where the
resources are not able to satisfy demand, water saving on traditional
consumption could be a way to contribute to the solution of the problem.
In this framework the Aquasave
Project (AP) is dealing with the consumption saving of potable water in
the city, by means of a new experimental way of resource consumption
management.
The European Commission, in
the framework of the life-environment action (Life 97 Environment /IT/000106),
financed 50% of total costs.
METHOD
The water
management system had been installed in a residential building of eight
flats; the construction phase had been completed by the autumn of 2000 (see
photo 1). The system maximizes
reuse by a) greywater
reuse system (see figure 2): it collects, treats and sends greywater (coming
from showers, bathtubs, and washbasins located in bathrooms) to toilet
flushing; b) rainwater use system (see figure 3): it collects, treats and
sends rainwater to dishwashers and washing machines. The system minimizes
waste production by installation in the flats of components at low
water consumption.
|
Figure 1. Water management.
|
Photo1. Construction phase.
|
|
MATERIALS
Building
The building has eight flats distributed on three
storeys. The floor of the plant room, where the treatment plant is
installed, is located three meters under the ground-floor. The roof
surface is about 200 m2.
The plant room surface is about 90 m2.
The plant room is about 2.9 m high. The persons living in the flats are
22.
Greywater Reuse
System
Greywater coming from bathroom
washbasins, bathtubs, and showers (see figure 2) is collected through an
appropriate network, pre-filtered (a grid stops solids: about 500 µm) and
sent to the collection tank in the plant room; then greywater is filtered
(through quartzite filter: about 50 µm), disinfected, and sent to the
storage tank. Afterwards, through a dedicated distribution network, a
loading system sends the treated greywater to the flats and then to the
toilet flushing cisterns. The treatment plant works automatically.
|
Figure
2. Reuse of treated greywater.
|
|
Rainwater
Use System
Rainfall coming from the roof
(see figure 3), collected through a dedicated
network, flows to the plant room. Here: first rainwater, which could be
highly polluted and rich in particulate, is separated and sent to the
sewer (depending on mm of rainfall); a pre-filter stops (through grid:
about 500 µm) leaves, pieces of paper, birds’ feathers and faeces, and
other solids; so pre-treated rainwater flows into the collecting tank.
Afterwards, rainwater is filtered (through quartzite filter: about 50 µm,
see photo 2), disinfected and sent to the storage tank to have a reserve
of water to be used in periods of little rainfall. Afterwards, through a
dedicated distribution network, a loading system sends the treated
rainwater to the flats and then to dishwashers and washing machines. The
appliances use rainwater at washing cycle beginning (~66% of total washing
machine consumption), and potable water at cycle end for final rinse. The
treatment plant is automatic.
The very low calcium and salt
concentration (a) allows reduction of detergent consumption, (b)
reduces need of salt regeneration in dishwasher ion-exchangers.
Rainfall is about 670 mm year-1. The surface of the roof is ~200
m2. Rainwater
availability for appliance consumption is ~100
m3 year-1.
A storage system of about 35 m3
collects rainwater in periods of high rainfall, to be used in period of
little rainfall.
|
Figure
3. Use of treated rainwater.
|
|
Consumption Reduction System
Simple technical solutions allowing
water consumption reduction, with the same comfort and performance, are
implemented. The main equipments applied are: (a) toilet flushing,
operating with cisterns (with dual discharge volume) of only 3.5 L versus
the traditional cisterns of 9 L; (b) water taps with two possibilities of
water flow rates (5 and 10 L/minute), provided with Venturi diffusers that
allow washing with lower water flow by mixing air to water (due to higher
water velocity); (c) washing machines using 60 L/cycle versus 100 L/cycle
for traditional cloth washing, (d) dish washers using 14 L/cycle versus 20
L/cycle for traditional dish washers.
In order to stimulate waste
reduction suggestions are made to users, like: watering the garden in the
evening when the temperature is not high, etc.
|
Photo2. Filter.
|
|
Separated Network System
Differentiated water distribution and discharge systems
are adopted; i.e.: the potable water network (distributing
water into sinks, bath-tubs, showers, etc.) is separated from the
“treated greywater” distribution network, and from the “treated
rainwater” distribution network.
There is no possibility of treated greywater
and rainwater water drinking.
|
Table 1. Disinfectant dose.
|
Table
2. Parameters after treatment.
|
Figure
4. Consumption percentage.
|
Figure
5. Comparison.
|
|
RESULTS
The main results, obtained from Nov 2000 till Nov 2001,
are reported below.
Table 1 shows the peracetic acid dose for a complete
disinfection (faecal coliforms up to zero: see table 2). Figure 4 shows
the consumption percentage in the flats. Figure
5 shows comparison between AP system consumption and the traditional one.
DISCUSSION
The potential water saving
percentage of the proposed AP system compared to the traditional one is
~50% of potable water (see
figure 5), of this: a) ~30% by
means of components at low water consumption, b) ~15%
by means of greywater reuse; c) ~5%
by means of rainwater use.
Greywater coming from body washing
(33% of total consumption in
the flats) is enough to feed the 23%
of toilet flushing consumption in the flats (see figure 4). Rainwater
allows ~8%
saving of the total consumption in the flats (see
figure 4); treated rainwater use represents ~66%
of total washing machine consumption.
CONCLUSION
Results show a valid possibility
for drinking water saving (~50%)
in households. Experimentation continuation will make it possible to
obtain more data about sustainable development.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Partners wish to thank all the people and companies
that have been working and co-operating in the AP.
PROJECT SECRETARIAT
ENEA (Italian
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment) Section of
Wastewater Treatment and Water Cycle; ENEA.PROT.IDR; B. Failla; Via
Martiri di Montesole, 4; 40129 Bologna (Italy); Telephone +39 051 6098698;
Fax +39 051 6098309; E-mail: failla@bologna.enea.it
|
|
|
|
 |

|
|
Back
to the top
Back
to the home page
Page
included the October, 9th, 2002
|